Euthanasia and physicians' moral duties

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):517 – 533 (2005)
Abstract
Opponents of euthanasia sometimes argue that it is incompatible with the purpose of medicine, since physicians have an unconditional duty never to intentionally cause death. But it is not clear how such a duty could ever actually be unconditional, if due consideration is given to the moral weight of countervailing duties equally fundamental to medicine. Whether physicians' moral duties are understood as correlative with patients' moral rights or construed noncorrelatively, a doctor's obligation to abstain from intentional killing cannot be more than a defeasible duty.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,404
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
G. Seay (2011). Euthanasia and Common Sense: A Reply to Garcia. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):321-327.
Benjamin E. Hippen (2005). Introduction. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):443 – 447.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

54 ( #30,167 of 1,103,008 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #62,017 of 1,103,008 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.