Pure Russellianism

Philosophical Papers 33 (2):171-202 (2004)
Abstract Abstract According to Russellianism, the content of a Russellian thought, in which a person ascribes a monadic property to an object, can be represented as an ordered couple of the object and the property. A consequence of this is that it is not possible for a person to believe that a is F and not to believe b is F, when a=b. Many critics of Russellianism suppose that this is possible and thus that Russellianism is false. Several arguments for this claim are criticized and it is argued that Russellians need not appeal to representational notions in order to defeat them. Contrary to popular opinion, the prospects for a pure Russellianism, a Russellianism without representations, are in fact very good
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    David Braun (2001). Russellianism and Prediction. Philosophical Studies 105 (1):59 - 105.
    David M. Braun (1998). Understanding Belief Reports. Philosophical Review 107 (4):555-595.
    Seyed N. Mousavian (2010). Neo-Meinongian Neo-Russellians. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):229-259.
    Cody Gilmore (forthcoming). Parts of Propositions. In Shieva Kleinschmidt (ed.), Mereology and Location. Oxford University Press.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-08-24

    Total downloads

    19 ( #64,404 of 549,122 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    8 ( #8,906 of 549,122 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums