David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Philosophy 1 (1):13-33 (2004)
This article examines the conception of the everyday city as presented in the work of architect Christopher Alexander and architectural theorist Bill Hillier. Both thinkers suggest that, in the past, lively urban places arose unself-consciously through the routine daily behaviors of many individual users coming together in supportive space and place. In different ways, both thinkers ask whether, today, a similar sort of vital urban district can be made to happen self-consciouslythrough explicit understanding transformed into design and policy principles. The aim for both Alexander and Hillier is place-based urban communities marked by lively streets, serendipitous public encounters, and informal sociability. The article begins by examining commonalities and differences in Alexander and Hillier’s conception of environmental wholeness and urban place. Next, the article considers implications for urban design and, finally, indicates the considerable value that the two thinkers’ ideas offer environmental philosophy, particularly for understanding environmental wholes
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David Macauley (2006). The Place of the Elements and the Elements of Place: Aristotelian Contributions to Environmental Thought. Ethics, Place and Environment 9 (2):187 – 206.
James W. Sheppard (2006). The Paradox of Urban Environmentalism: Problem and Possibility. Ethics, Place and Environment 9 (3):299 – 315.
David A. Gruenewald (2005). Accountability and Collaboration: Institutional Barriers and Strategic Pathways for Place-Based Education. Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (3):261 – 283.
Bryan G. Norton & Bruce Hannon (1997). Environmental Values: A Place-Based Approach. Environmental Ethics 19 (3):227-245.
Abraham Akkerman (2009). Urban Void and the Deconstruction of Neo-Platonic City-Form. Ethics, Place and Environment 12 (2):205 – 218.
Bruce Hannon (1997). Environmental Values. Environmental Ethics 19 (3):227-245.
James W. Sheppard (2003). The Nectar is in the Journey: Pragmatism, Progress, and the Promise of Incrementalism. Philosophy and Geography 6 (2):167 – 187.
Jon Anderson (2004). The Ties That Bind? Self- and Place-Identity in Environmental Direct Action. Ethics, Place and Environment 7 (1 & 2):45 – 57.
Christopher Schlottmann (2005). Introduction: Place-Based and Environmental Education. Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (3):257 – 259.
Daniel Berthold-Bond (2000). The Ethics of “Place”. Environmental Ethics 22 (1):5-24.
Marcelo Lopes De Souza (2000). Urban Development on the Basis of Autonomy: A Politico-Philosophical and Ethical Framework for Urban Planning and Management. Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (2):187 – 201.
Daniel Berthold-Bond (2000). The Ethics of “Place”: Reflections on Bioregionalism. Environmental Ethics 22 (1):5-24.
Miroslav Marcelli (2000). City. Theoria 15 (3):451-461.
Midori Kagawa-Fox (2010). Environmental Ethics From the Japanese Perspective. Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (1):57 – 73.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads2 ( #361,129 of 1,099,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #303,379 of 1,099,746 )
How can I increase my downloads?