Realism reconstructed: A reply
Philosophical Forum 35 (3):275–280 (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEddy M. Zemach (1991). Perceptual Realism, Naive and Otherwise. In John Searle and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Anthonie W. M. Meijers (2000). Physical and Mental? Reply to John Searle. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (2):179 – 183.
Mervyn Hartwig (2010). Response to Datta, Frauley and Pearce. Journal of Critical Realism 9 (2):248-254.
J. W. Scott (1920). Syndicalism and Philosophical Realism. Philosophical Review 29 (2):179-183.
John J. Haldane (1993). Theory, Realism and Common Sense: A Reply to Paul Churchland. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 93:321-327.
Sandra Rosenthal (2004). Experience as Experimental and Reconstructed Realism: An Interwoven Core of Mead's Philosophy. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 28 (1):168–182.
Tronn Overend (1978). Social Realism and Social Idealism: Two Competing Orientations on the Relation Between Theory, Praxis, and Objectivity. Inquiry 21 (1-4):271 – 311.
Michael Dickson (1995). An Empirical Reply to Empiricism: Protective Measurement Opens the Door for Quantum Realism. Philosophy of Science 62 (1):122-140.
Nino Cocchiarella (1982). Meinong Reconstructed Versus Early Russell Reconstructed. Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (2):183 - 214.
Rupert Read (2002). Is ‘What is Time?’ A Good Question to Ask? Philosophy 77 (2):193-210.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads59 ( #16,827 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #27,255 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
