David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Over the last three decades, the application of evolutionary theory to the human sciences has shown remarkable growth. This growth has also been characterised by a ‘splitting’ process, with the emergence of distinct sub-disciplines, most notably: Human Behavioural Ecology (HBE), Evolutionary Psychology (EP) and studies of Cultural Evolution (CE). Multiple applications of evolutionary ideas to the human sciences are undoubtedly a good thing, demonstrating the usefulness of this approach to human affairs. Nevertheless, this fracture has been associated with considerable tension, a lack of integration, and sometimes outright conflict between researchers. In recent years however, there have been clear signs of hope that a synthesis of the human evolutionary behavioural sciences is underway. Here, we briefly review the history of the debate, both its theoretical and practical causes; then provide evidence that the field is currently becoming more integrated, as the traditional boundaries between sub-disciplines become blurred. This article constitutes the first paper under the new editorship of the Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, which aims to further this integration by explicitly providing a forum for integrated work.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
David W. Lawson & Ruth Mace (2010). Optimizing Modern Family Size. Human Nature 21 (1):39-61.
Similar books and articles
E. Machery & K. Cohen (2012). An Evidence-Based Study of the Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (1):177-226.
John S. Price (2006). Behavioural Ecology as a Basic Science for Evolutionary Psychiatry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):420-421.
P. A. Russell & D. P. Carey (2000). Niche Construction at the “Workface” of the Human Behavioural Sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):158-158.
Kevin N. Laland & Gillian Brown (2011). Sense and Nonsense: Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behaviour. OUP Oxford.
Frederick Toates (2005). Evolutionary Psychology -- Towards a More Integrative Model. Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):305-328.
Kevin N. Laland, John Odling-Smee, Marcus W. Feldman & Jeremy Kendal (2009). Conceptual Barriers to Progress Within Evolutionary Biology. Foundations of Science 14 (3):195-216.
John Lazarus (2003). Let's Cooperate to Understand Cooperation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):169-170.
N. Laland Kevin, Marcus John Odling-Smee & Jeremy Kendal W. Feldman (2009). Conceptual Barriers to Progress Within Evolutionary Biology. Foundations of Science 14 (3).
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-07-25
Total downloads1 ( #454,238 of 1,100,138 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #304,144 of 1,100,138 )
How can I increase my downloads?