David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Research in Phenomenology 40 (3):363-377 (2011)
I present `disruption' as what is most fundamental to Levinas' account of transcendence. I argue that one should read his treatment of the Other as a modulation of transcendence, and prioritize the structures of positionality and solitude as the conditions that make transcendence possible. Hence, Being is transcended insofar as these structures have `always already' articulated the rupturing of the subject, which, for Levinas, constitutes her transcending. Included in my argument is a critique of reading Levinas' project as undermining the fundamentally solitary nature of human existence because of his focus on alterity. Such a reading reduces Levinas' account of alterity, instead of maintaining its signification as that which is `never there.' It is the solitary existent who is vulnerable before an `already gone by' alterity, such that her subjectivity is radically disrupted. For Levinas, an encounter with alterity is the agony of finding no one, or having nowhere, from which I can be granted wholeness or justification. It follows that transcendence is fundamentally concretized in a positioned solitude, and not in some inter-subjective space
|Keywords||disruption transcendence identity il y a Levinas|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Bernasconi (2005). No Exit: Levinas' Aporetic Account of Transcendence. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):101-117.
Theodorus de Boer (1997). The Rationality of Transcendence: Studies in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. J.C. Gieben.
Kris Sealey (2010). Levinas's Early Account of Transcendence. Levinas Studies 5:99-116.
Carl Sachs (2011). The Acknowledgement of Transcendence: Anti-Theodicy in Adorno and Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):273-294.
Bettina Bergo (2005). Ontology, Transcendence, and Immanence in Emmanuel Levinas' Philosophy. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):141-180.
Barbara Jane Davy (2007). An Other Face of Ethics in Levinas. Ethics and the Environment 12 (1):39-66.
John Drabinski (2006). The Enigma of the Cartesian Infinite. Studia Phaenomenologica 6:201-213.
Diane Perpich (2008). The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford University Press.
Christina M. Gschwandtner (2007). The Neighbor and the Infinite: Marion and Levinas on the Encounter Between Self, Human Other, and God. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):231-249.
Donald L. Turner & Ford Turrell (2007). The Non-Existent God: Transcendence, Humanity, and Ethics in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. Philosophia 35 (3-4):375 - 382.
Daniel Murphy (2007). Levinas and Kierkegaard on Divine Transcendence and Ethical Life: Response to Donald L. Turner and Ford Turrell's “The Non-Existent God”. [REVIEW] Philosophia 35 (3-4):383-385.
Erich P. Schellhammer (2000). Levinas, Emmanuel. Alterity and Transcendence. Review of Metaphysics 54 (2):452-453.
Paul Davies (2005). Asymmetry and Transcendence: On Scepticism and First Philosophy. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):118-140.
Ethan Kleinberg (2012). In/Finite Time: Tracing Transcendence to Emmanuel Levinas's Talmudic Lectures. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (3):375-387.
Added to index2010-10-18
Total downloads23 ( #84,065 of 1,413,447 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #94,648 of 1,413,447 )
How can I increase my downloads?