David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Etica E Politica. Cambridge University Press 173-202 (2007)
By John R. Searle Copyright John R. Searle I. Naturalizing Language I believe that the greatest achievements in philosophy over the past hundred or one hundred and twenty five years have been in the philosophy of language. Beginning with Frege, who invented the subject, and continuing through Russell, Wittgenstein, Quine, Austin and their successors, right to the present day, there is no branch of philosophy with so much high quality work as the philosophy of language. In my view, the only achievement comparable to those of the great philosophers of language is Rawls’s reinvention of the subject of political philosophy (and therefore implicitly the subject of ethics). But with this one possible exception, I think that work in the philosophy of language is at the top of our achievements. Having said that, however, I have to record a serious misgiving I have about the subject. The problem is that its practitioners in general do not treat language as a natural phenomenon. This may seem a strange charge to make, given that so many contemporary and recent philosophers of language are anxious to emphasize the empirical character of their theories of language. Quine and Davidson are striking examples of resolute empiricism. My objection is that few contemporary and recent philosophers of language attempt to treat language as a natural extension of non-linguistic biological capacities. Language is not seen as continuous with, nor as an extension of, the rest of our specifically human biological inheritance. I think there is a deep reason, both historically and intellectually, why language has not been treated naturalistically. It is..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Arto Laitinen (2014). Against Representations with Two Directions of Fit. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (1):179-199.
Daniele Chiffi (2012). Idiolects and Language. Axiomathes 22 (4):417-432.
Giuseppe Vicari & Mauro Adenzato (2014). Is Recursion Language-Specific?: Evidence of Recursive Mechanisms in the Structure of Intentional Action. Consciousness and Cognition 26:169-188.
Similar books and articles
Abraham Mansbach (2002). Beyond Subjectivism: Heidegger on Language and the Human Being. Greenwood Press.
Patricia Hanna (2004). Word and World: Practice and the Foundations of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Ian Hacking (1975). Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? Cambridge University Press.
Jennifer Hornsby & Guy Longworth (eds.) (2006). Reading Philosophy of Language: Selected Texts with Interactive Commentary. Blackwell Pub..
Aloysius Martinich (ed.) (2008). The Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
Oswald Hanfling (2000). Philosophy and Ordinary Language: The Bent and Genius of Our Tongue. Routledge.
Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.) (2007). John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Francis Y. Lin (1999). Chomsky on the 'Ordinary Language' View of Language. Synthese 120 (2):151-191.
Ruth G. Millikan (2005). Language: A Biological Model. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads90 ( #48,904 of 1,934,578 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,193 of 1,934,578 )
How can I increase my downloads?