David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studia Phaenomenologica 6:261-273 (2006)
The aim of this article is to give an account of the Levinasian description of the Father/Son relation and to evaluate its philosophical implications, in particular in the domain of phenomenology. It will also consider the Levinasian description of the feminine, which is often problematical on account of its machismo. It is argued that these two questions, apparently quite unrelated, are in fact closely linked: they both derive from a common aporia situated at the heart of the decisive phenomenological description of the trial of otherness
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Amber Jacobs (2007). The Potential of Theory: Melanie Klein, Luce Irigaray, and the Mother-Daughter Relationship. Hypatia 22 (3):175-193.
JT Paasch (2011). Are the Father and Son Different in Kind? Scotus and Ockham on Different Kinds of Things, Univocal and Equivocal Production, and Subordination in the Trinity. Vivarium 48 (3-4):302-326.
Jt Paasch (2010). Arius and Athanasius on the Production of God's Son. Faith and Philosophy 27 (4):382-404.
Jt Paasch (2012). Divine Production in Late Medieval Trinitarian Theology: Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham. Oxford University Press.
Giuseppe Bartolozzi (2010). Origene e il dibattito sulla divinità del Logos nella prima metà del secolo III. Augustinianum 50 (1):61-82.
Stephen David Ross (2009). For Giving. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:469-504.
William Hasker (2009). A Leftovian Trinity? Faith and Philosophy 26 (2):154-166.
Kathy Faber-Langendoen (2001). Casting Off the Perishable. Journal of Medical Humanities 22 (4):285-297.
H. E. Baber (2008). Trinity, Filioque and Semantic Ascent. Sophia 47 (2):149 - 160.
Melvyn New (2009). Taking Care : A Slightly Levinasian Reading of Dombey and Son. In Donald R. Wehrs & David P. Haney (eds.), Levinas and Nineteenth-Century Literature: Ethics and Otherness From Romanticism Through Realism. University of Delaware Press.
Ruth G. Millikan (2005). The Father, the Son, and the Daughter: Sellars, Brandom, and Millikan. Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):59-71.
Daniel Shannon (2009). Justifying Atonement: An Anselmian Response to Modern Critics. Saint Anselm Journal 6 (2):1 - 19.
Matthew Levering (2011). Medieval Trinitarian Thought From Aquinas to Ockham (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):374-375.
Ali Teymoori & Wan Shahrazad (2011). Relationship Between Mother, Father, and Peer Attachment and Empathy With Moral Authority. Ethics and Behavior 22 (1):16 - 29.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads5 ( #255,802 of 1,410,035 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,059 of 1,410,035 )
How can I increase my downloads?