David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
New Scholasticism 55 (2):191-207 (1981)
The purpose of this dissertation is to provide a defence of Aristotle's principle of contradiction against the critique made on it by Jan Lukasiewicz in an article he wrote in 1910 which was translated and published in the March 1971 number of The Review of Metaphysics. Lukasiewicz maintains in general that the law of contradiction has no logical worth. Specifically, he charges Aristotle with having several laws of contradiction instead of one as Aristotle claims; with attempting to prove the law despite his claim that this is impossible and finally with failing in the very attempt to prove the law, or at least one of its formulations. In 20 chapters, each dealing with a respective section of Lukasiewicz's article, I attempt to show that all of Lukasiewicz's allegations are unfounded. My methodology is simply to follow Lukasiewicz through his 20 sections and compare what he says with what Aristotle actually wrote. If successful, this dissertation will show, in basic agreement with Professor Joseph Owens, that the best way to read Aristotle is on his own terms and not, as in the case of Lukasiewicz, via the latest developments in symbolic logic. I reiterate, with Aristotle, that the law of contradiction is the basic principle of being qua being and has logical worth precisely because of that fact
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael V. Wedin (2004). Aristotle on the Firmness of the Principle of Non-Contradiction. Phronesis 49 (3):225 - 265.
Michael Wedin (2004). Aristotle on the Firmness of the Principle of Non-Contradiction. Phronesis 49 (3):225-265.
Dirk Baltzly (1999). Aristotle and Platonic Dialectic in Metaphysics Gamma. Apeiron 32 (4):171-202.
Michael V. Wedin (2003). A Curious Turn in Metaphysics Gamma: Protagoras and Strong Denial of the Principle of Non-Contradiction. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (2):107-130.
Aristotle (1993). Metaphysics: Books Gamma, Delta, and Epsilon. Clarendon Press.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2009). The Law of Non-Contradiction as a Metaphysical Principle. Australasian Journal of Logic 7:32-47.
Venanzio Raspa (1999). Łukasiewicz on the Principle of Contradiction. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:57-112.
Ben Kimpel (1934). A Critique of the Logic of Contradiction as the Exclusive Principle of Interpretation in an Idealistic Metaphysic. Scottdale, Pa.,Printed by the Mennonite Press.
S. Marc Cohen (1986). Aristotle on the Principle of Non-Contradiction. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):359-370.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2008). The Aristotelian Method and Aristotelian Metaphysics. In Patricia Hanna (ed.), An Anthology of Philosophical Studies. ATINER
Alfonso García Marqués (2007). Sentido y Contradicción. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:127-136.
Francesco Berto (2006). Meaning, Metaphysics, and Contradiction. American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (4):283-297.
Greg Restall (2006). Laws of Non-Contradiction, Laws of the Excluded Middle, and Logics. In Graham Priest, J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Clarendon Press
Yun Lu (2013). Reducts of the Random Bipartite Graph. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 54 (1):33-46.
Jan Lukasiewicz & Vernon Wedin (1971). On the Principle of Contradiction in Aristotle. Review of Metaphysics 24 (3):485 - 509.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads12 ( #357,405 of 1,940,981 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #225,856 of 1,940,981 )
How can I increase my downloads?