Wittgenstein's diagnosis of empiricism's third dogma: Why perception is not an amalgam of sensation and conceptualization

Philosophical Investigations 27 (1):1-33 (2004)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Empiricism  Epistemology  Perception  Sensation  Wittgenstein
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,351
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Pete Mandik (2005). Action-Oriented Representation. In Andrew Brook & Kathleen Akins (eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Cambridge University Press. 284--305.
    Cliff A. Hooker (1973). Empiricism, Perception and Conceptual Change. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (September):59-74.
    E. L. Mascall (1964). Perception and Sensation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64:259-272.
    Gerald E. Myers (1971). William James on Time Perception. Philosophy of Science 38 (September):353-360.
    B. A. Farrell (1973). Temporal Precedence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73:193-216.
    Peter Pagin (2000). Sensation Terms. Dialectica 54 (3):177-99.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-01-28

    Total downloads

    106 ( #7,976 of 1,088,400 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,400 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.