Wittgenstein's diagnosis of empiricism's third dogma: Why perception is not an amalgam of sensation and conceptualization

Philosophical Investigations 27 (1):1-33 (2004)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Empiricism  Epistemology  Perception  Sensation  Wittgenstein
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9205.2004.00212.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Pete Mandik (2005). Action-Oriented Representation. In Andrew Brook & Kathleen Akins (eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Cambridge University Press 284--305.
Cliff A. Hooker (1973). Empiricism, Perception and Conceptual Change. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (September):59-74.
E. L. Mascall (1964). Perception and Sensation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64:259-272.
Gerald E. Myers (1971). William James on Time Perception. Philosophy of Science 38 (September):353-360.
B. A. Farrell (1973). Temporal Precedence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73:193-216.
Peter Pagin (2000). Sensation Terms. Dialectica 54 (3):177-99.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

127 ( #20,149 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.