David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):7-24 (2002)
Maimonides’ negative theology has generated controversy ever since it was advanced in The Guide of the Perplexed. Unlike Aquinas,Maimonides does not allow predication by analogy or anything else that compromises the radical separation between God and creatures. The standard objection to Maimonides is that his view is so extreme that it undermines important features of religious life, most pointedly the institution of prayer. I argue that Maimonides was well aware of the problems caused by negative theology and provides us with ingenious ways to handle them. Overall I attempt to show that for Maimonides, religious language is not referentialbut heuristic: rather than depict the structure of an underlying reality, its function is to prepare the mind for a particular kind of reflection
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hilary Putnam (1997). On Negative Theology. Faith and Philosophy 14 (4):407-422.
Moses Maimonides & Salo Wittmayer Baron (eds.) (1941). Essays on Maimonides. New York, Ams Press.
Kenneth Seeskin (2005). Maimonides on the Origin of the World. Cambridge University Press.
Joseph G. Trabbic (2003). Maimonides, Aquinas, and Interreligious Dialogue. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:221-234.
Daniel Davies (2011). Method and Metaphysics in Maimonides' Guide for the Perplexed. Oxford University Press.
Diana Lobel (2002). “Silence Is Praise to You”. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):25-49.
Michael Fagenblat (2008). Levinas and Maimonides: From Metaphysics to Ethical Negative Theology. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 16 (1):95-147.
Don Seeman (2008). Honoring the Divine as Virtue and Practice in Maimonides. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 16 (2):195-251.
Joshua Parens (2006). Leaving the Garden. Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):219-246.
Allan Nadler (2007). The "Rambam Revival" in Early Modern Jewish Thought Maskilim, Mitnagdim, and Hasidim on Maimonides' Guide of the Perplexed. In Jay Michael Harris (ed.), Maimonides After 800 Years: Essays on Maimonides and His Influence. Distributed by Harvard University Press
Owen Goldin (1992). Metaphysical Explanation and “Partcularization” in Maimonides' Guide of the Perplexed. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:189-213.
Menachem Kellner (2002). Is Maimonides' Ideal Person Austerely Rationalist? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):125-143.
Kenneth Seeskin (ed.) (2005). The Cambridge Companion to Maimonides. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-02-22
Total downloads10 ( #363,510 of 1,938,529 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #449,299 of 1,938,529 )
How can I increase my downloads?