David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (2):237-246 (2008)
It has been claimed that modern long-standing scientific theories are fertile, in the sense of having been progressively successfully modified to meet new experimental observations or theoretical developments in related areas, and that these modifications arise naturally from each preceding version of the theory. McMullin has advanced this form of fertility as a vindication of scientific realism, since if the theories did not approximate the real, the observation would be inexplicable. In response Nolan has denied the existence of fertility in this sense as an independent virtue. The present paper argues that the rebuttal is flawed. Introduction McMullin's P-fertility Fertility Explained Away as Novel Prediction Conclusion CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Samuel Schindler (2013). Theory-Laden Experimentation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):89-101.
Similar books and articles
Bas C. van Fraassen (2003). On McMullin's Appreciation of Realism Concerning the Sciences. Philosophy of Science 70 (3):479-492.
Michela Massimi (2004). Non‐Defensible Middle Ground for Experimental Realism: Why We Are Justified to Believe in Colored Quarks. Philosophy of Science 71 (1):36-60.
Jarrett Leplin (1997). A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism. Oxford University Press.
Doris J. Baker & Mary A. Paterson (1994). Distributive Justice and the Regulation of Fertility Centers: An Analysis of the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (3):383.
John Clarke (2007). The History of Three Scientific Societies: The Society for the Study of Fertility (Now the Society for Reproduction and Fertility) (Britain), the Société Française Pour l'Étude de la Fertilité, and the Society for the Study of Reproduction (USA). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (2):340-357.
John T. Manning & Alex R. Gage (2000). Low Fluctuating Asymmetry (FA) and Short-Term Benefits in Fertility? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):610-611.
Daniel Nolan (1999). Is Fertility Virtuous in its Own Right? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):265-282.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #135,867 of 1,902,530 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #329,673 of 1,902,530 )
How can I increase my downloads?