Some completeness theorems in the dynamic doxastic logic of iterated belief revision

Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (2):228-246 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The success of the AGM paradigmn, Gis remarkable, as even a quick look at the literature it has generated will testify. But it is also remarkable, at least in hindsight, how limited was the original effort. For example, the theory concerns the beliefs of just one agent; all incoming information is accepted; belief change is uniquely determined by the new information; there is no provision for nested beliefs. And perhaps most surprising: there is no analysis of iterated change

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-04

Downloads
102 (#167,348)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Krister Segerberg
Uppsala University

Citations of this work

Krister Segerberg on Logic of Actions.Robert Trypuz (ed.) - 2013 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag.
A Modal Logic of Metaphor.Krister Segerberg - 2011 - Studia Logica 99 (1-3):337-347.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David K. Lewis - 1973 - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Dynamic logic for belief revision.Johan van Benthem - 2007 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17 (2):129-155.

Add more references