Connectionism and the causal theory of action explanation

Philosophical Psychology 11 (4):511-532 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely assumed that common sense psychological explanations of human action are a species of causal explanation. I argue against this construal, drawing on Ramsey et al.'s paper, “Connectionism, eliminativism, and the future of folk psychology”. I argue that if certain connec-tionist models are correct, then mental states cannot be identified with functionally discrete causes of behavior, and I respond to some recent attempts to deny this claim. However, I further contend that our common sense psychological practices are not committed to the falsity of such connectionist models. The paper concludes that common sense psychology is not committed to the identification of mental states with functionally discrete causes of behavior, and hence that common sense psychology is not committed to the causal account of action explanation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Connectionism and Eliminativism.Cynthia Macdonald - 1995 - In Cynthia Macdonald & Graham F. Macdonald (eds.), Connectionism: Debates on Psychological Explanation. Cambridge: Blackwell.
An argument against the causal theory of action explanation.Scott R. Sehon - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):67-85.
Is connectionism commonsense?Gerard J. O'Brien - 1991 - Philosophical Psychology 4 (2):165-78.
Beyond eliminativism.Andy Clark - 1989 - Mind and Language 4 (4):251-79.
Connectionism isn't magic.Hugh Clapin - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (2):167-84.
Connectionist minds.Andy Clark - 1995 - In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Cambridge: Blackwell. pp. 83 - 102.
Connectionism, eliminativism, and the future of folk psychology.William Ramsey, Stephen P. Stich & J. Garon - 1991 - In William Ramsey, Stephen P. Stich & D. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 499-533.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
105 (#161,390)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The language of thought hypothesis.Murat Aydede - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations