Deviant causal chains and the irreducibility of teleological explanation

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):195–213 (1997)
Abstract
We typically explain human action teleologically, by citing the action's goal or purpose. However, a broad class of naturalistic projects within the philosophy of mind presuppose that teleological explanation is reducible to causal explanation. In this paper I argue that two recently suggested strategies - one suggested by Al Mele and the other proposed by John Bishop and Christopher Peacocke - fail to provide a successful causal analysis of teleological explanation. The persistent troubles encountered by the reductive project suggest that teleological explanations are irreducible and that the naturalistic accounts of mind and agency should be called into question.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,085
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Joshua Shepherd (2014). The Contours of Control. Philosophical Studies 170 (3):395-411.
Yair Levy (2013). Intentional Action First. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):705-718.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

48 ( #34,210 of 1,101,604 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #35,036 of 1,101,604 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.