David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (2):161-171 (2009)
Personhood constitutes the pivotal point in the abortion debate. There exists a diversity of views as to when foetal personhood actually starts—from conception and implantation to viability and even birth. One perspective that has lost support for decades is that of quickening, a stance associated with Lord Ellenborough’s 1803 Act. This paper attempts to put quickening back into the limelight, albeit through a new interpretation. After discussing its philosophy and underpinning rationale, I will assess a number of arguments that have been directed against quickening as a viable point of distinction. I conclude by suggesting that according to modern proponents of quickening proponents, rational soul ensoulment begins after a certain degree of cerebral cortical formation has been realized, thus marking foetal volition, which promotes foetal interests, for the first time.
|Keywords||Abortion Personhood Quickening|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Derek Parfit (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.
John Locke (2008/1995). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford University Press.
Plato, John M. Cooper & D. S. Hutchinson (eds.) (1997). Plato: Complete Works. Hackett Publishing Co..
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971). A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Elliott Louis Bedford (2012). Abortion: At the Still Point of the Turning Conscientious Objection Debate. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 24 (2):63-82.
Stacey L. Edgar (2000). Gregory J. E. Rawlins, Slaves of the Machine: The Quickening of Computer Technology. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 10 (3):444-448.
Sean McConnell (2008). How Kant Might Explain Ugliness. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):205-228.
Nancy Davis (1993). The Abortion Debate: The Search for Common Ground, Part 1:Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community. Faye D. Ginsburg; Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. Laurence H. Tribe. [REVIEW] Ethics 103 (3):516-.
Nancy Davis (1993). The Abortion Debate: The Search for Common Ground, Part 2:Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community Faye D. Ginsburg; Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes Laurence H. Tribe. Ethics 103 (4):731-.
Chris Meyers (2010). The Fetal Position: A Rational Approach to the Abortion Debate. Prometheus Books.
Chris Kaposy (2012). Two Stalemates in the Philosophical Debate About Abortion and Why They Cannot Be Resolved Using Analogical Arguments. Bioethics 26 (2):84-92.
S. McLean (2002). Interests in Abortion: A New Perspective on Foetal Potential and the Abortion Debate: T Martin. Avebury, 2000, Pound40.00, Pp 113. ISBN 0-7546-1146-. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):132-a-132.
Added to index2009-03-23
Total downloads47 ( #88,793 of 1,796,206 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #98,157 of 1,796,206 )
How can I increase my downloads?