Reinterpreting the 'quickening' perspective in the abortion debate
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (2):161-171 (2009)
| Abstract | Personhood constitutes the pivotal point in the abortion debate. There exists a diversity of views as to when foetal personhood actually starts—from conception and implantation to viability and even birth. One perspective that has lost support for decades is that of quickening, a stance associated with Lord Ellenborough’s 1803 Act. This paper attempts to put quickening back into the limelight, albeit through a new interpretation. After discussing its philosophy and underpinning rationale, I will assess a number of arguments that have been directed against quickening as a viable point of distinction. I conclude by suggesting that according to modern proponents of quickening proponents, rational soul ensoulment begins after a certain degree of cerebral cortical formation has been realized, thus marking foetal volition, which promotes foetal interests, for the first time. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesChris Kaposy (2012). Two Stalemates in the Philosophical Debate About Abortion and Why They Cannot Be Resolved Using Analogical Arguments. Bioethics 26 (2):84-92.
Chris Meyers (2010). The Fetal Position: A Rational Approach to the Abortion Debate. Prometheus Books.
Sean McConnell (2008). How Kant Might Explain Ugliness. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):205-228.
Stacey L. Edgar (2000). Gregory J. E. Rawlins, Slaves of the Machine: The Quickening of Computer Technology. Minds and Machines 10 (3):444-448.
Elliott Louis Bedford (2012). Abortion: At the Still Point of the Turning Conscientious Objection Debate. HEC Forum 24 (2):63-82.
S. McLean (2002). Interests in Abortion: A New Perspective on Foetal Potential and the Abortion Debate: T Martin. Avebury, 2000, Pound40.00, Pp 113. ISBN 0-7546-1146-. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):132-a-132.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-03-23Total downloads31 ( #39,400 of 550,498 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 550,498 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
