Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (2):161-171 (2009)
|Abstract||Personhood constitutes the pivotal point in the abortion debate. There exists a diversity of views as to when foetal personhood actually starts—from conception and implantation to viability and even birth. One perspective that has lost support for decades is that of quickening, a stance associated with Lord Ellenborough’s 1803 Act. This paper attempts to put quickening back into the limelight, albeit through a new interpretation. After discussing its philosophy and underpinning rationale, I will assess a number of arguments that have been directed against quickening as a viable point of distinction. I conclude by suggesting that according to modern proponents of quickening proponents, rational soul ensoulment begins after a certain degree of cerebral cortical formation has been realized, thus marking foetal volition, which promotes foetal interests, for the first time.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Chris Kaposy (2012). Two Stalemates in the Philosophical Debate About Abortion and Why They Cannot Be Resolved Using Analogical Arguments. Bioethics 26 (2):84-92.
Chris Meyers (2010). The Fetal Position: A Rational Approach to the Abortion Debate. Prometheus Books.
Nancy (1993). The Abortion Debate: The Search for Common Ground, Part 2:Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community Faye D. Ginsburg; Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes Laurence H. Tribe. Ethics 103 (4):731-.
Nancy (1993). The Abortion Debate: The Search for Common Ground, Part 1:Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community. Faye D. Ginsburg; Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. Laurence H. Tribe. [REVIEW] Ethics 103 (3):516-.
Sean McConnell (2008). How Kant Might Explain Ugliness. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):205-228.
Stacey L. Edgar (2000). Gregory J. E. Rawlins, Slaves of the Machine: The Quickening of Computer Technology. Minds and Machines 10 (3):444-448.
Elliott Louis Bedford (2012). Abortion: At the Still Point of the Turning Conscientious Objection Debate. HEC Forum 24 (2):63-82.
S. McLean (2002). Interests in Abortion: A New Perspective on Foetal Potential and the Abortion Debate: T Martin. Avebury, 2000, Pound40.00, Pp 113. ISBN 0-7546-1146-. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):132-a-132.
Added to index2009-03-23
Total downloads31 ( #39,400 of 550,498 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 550,498 )
How can I increase my downloads?