Concepts as involving laws and inconceivable without them
Philosophy of Science 15 (October):287-313 (1948)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Concept Counterfactual Implication Laws Logic Metaphysics Particulars Possible World Universal | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesE. D. Klemke (1966). The Laws of Logic. Philosophy of Science 33 (3):271-277.
Andrew Newman (1992). The Physical Basis of Predication. Cambridge University Press.
Andreas Hüttemann, Alexander Reutlinger & Gerhard Schurz, Ceteris Paribus Laws. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Marc Lange (1999). Why Are the Laws of Nature so Important to Science? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):625-652.
Fred I. Dretske (1977). Laws of Nature. Philosophy of Science 44 (2):248-268.
Danilo Šuster (2005). Popper on Laws and Counterfactuals. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):109-119.
Jakob Hohwy (2003). Capacities, Explanation and the Possibility of Disunity. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):179 – 190.
Marc Lange (2005). Laws and Their Stability. Synthese 144 (3):415Ð432.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads42 ( #26,949 of 548,977 )Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #8,782 of 548,977 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
