Induction as vindication

Philosophy of Science 31 (3):197-231 (1964)
Abstract
1. I shall attempt in this paper to give a rounded, if schematic, account of the concept of probability. My central concern will be to clarify the sense in which law-like statements (including 'statistical' law-like statements) are made probable by observational data which, in a sense equally demanding analysis, 'accord' with them
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/288004
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 17,781
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
M. Bryson Brown & Graham Priest (2015). Chunk and Permeate II: Bohr’s Hydrogen Atom. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (3):297-314.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

30 ( #114,937 of 1,779,332 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #95,691 of 1,779,332 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.