David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Developing World Bioethics 8 (2):115-125 (2008)
This paper examines cumulative ethical and self-interested reasons why wealthy developed nations should be motivated to do more to improve health care in developing countries. Egalitarian and human rights reasons why wealthy nations should do more to improve global health are that doing so would (1) promote equality of opportunity, (2) improve the situation of the worst-off, (3) promote respect of the human right to have one's most basic needs met, and (4) reduce undeserved inequalities in well-being. Utilitarian reasons for improving global health are that this would (5) promote the greater good of humankind, and (6) achieve enormous benefits while requiring only small sacrifices. Libertarian reasons are that this would (7) amend historical injustices and (8) meet the obligation to amend injustices that developed world countries have contributed to. Self-interested reasons why wealthy nations should do more to improve global health are that doing so would (9) reduce the threat of infectious diseases to developed countries, (10) promote developed countries' economic interests, and (11) promote global security. All of these reasons count, and together they add up to make an overwhelmingly powerful case for change. Those opposed to wealthy government funding of developing world health improvement would most likely appeal, implicitly or explicitly, to the idea that coercive taxation for redistributive purposes would violate the right of an individual to keep his hard-earned income. The idea that this reason not to improve global health should outweigh the combination of rights and values embodied in the eleven reasons enumerated above, however, is implausibly extreme, morally repugnant and perhaps imprudent.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Roger S. Magnusson (2010). Global Health Governance and the Challenge of Chronic, Non-Communicable Disease. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):490-507.
Paul Bellaby, Rob Flynn & Miriam Ricci (2011). Substituting 'H2 for C' and Reducing Global Inequalities in Health. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (1):91 - 103.
Allen Buchanan & Matthew DeCamp (2006). Responsibility for Global Health. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (1):95-114.
S. R. Benatar & Gillian Brock (eds.) (2011). Global Health and Global Health Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Jennifer Prah Ruger (2009). Global Health Justice. Public Health Ethics 2 (3):261-275.
Lindsay F. Wiley (2010). Mitigation/Adaptation and Health: Health Policymaking in the Global Response to Climate Change and Implications for Other Upstream Determinants. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):629-639.
A. E. Denburg (2010). Global Child Health Ethics: Testing the Limits of Moral Communities. Public Health Ethics 3 (3):239-258.
Jan Sutherland & Elaine Gibson (2007). Cosmopolitanism and Global Public Health. Social Philosophy Today 23:133-148.
Ilona Kickbusch, Wolfgang Hein & Gaudenz Silberschmidt (2010). Addressing Global Health Governance Challenges Through a New Mechanism: The Proposal for a Committee C of the World Health Assembly. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):550-563.
Samuel H. Nelson (2002). The West's Moral Obligation to Assist Developing Nations in the Fight Against HIV/AIDS. Health Care Analysis 10 (1):87-108.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #118,966 of 1,100,076 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #90,379 of 1,100,076 )
How can I increase my downloads?