Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 29 (1):7-26 (1962)
|Abstract||The essay adopts the Tractarian view that configurations of objects are expressed by configurations of names. Two alternatives are considered: The objects in atomic facts are (1) without exception particulars; (2) one or more particulars plus a universal (Gustav Bergmann). On (1) a mode of configuration is always an empirical relation: on (2) it is the logical nexus of 'exemplification.' It is argued that (1) is both Wittgenstein's view in the Tractatus and correct. It is also argued that exemplification is a 'quasi-semantical' relation, and that it (and universals) are "in the world" only in that broad sense in which the 'world' includes linguistic norms and roles viewed (thus in translating) from the standpoint of a fellow participant|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Fraser MacBride (2005). The Particular–Universal Distinction: A Dogma of Metaphysics? Mind 114 (455):565-614.
E. D. Klemke (1971). Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana,University of Illinois Press.
Philipp Keller (2007). A World of Truthmakers. In Jean-Maurice Monnoyer (ed.), Metaphysics and Truthmakers. Ontos Verlag.
Paul D. Wienpahl (1964). Wittgenstein and the Naming Relation. Inquiry 7 (1-4):329 – 347.
Colin Johnston (2009). Tractarian Objects and Logical Categories. Synthese 167 (1):145 - 161.
Daniel Giberman (2012). Against Zero-Dimensional Material Objects (and Other Bare Particulars). Philosophical Studies 160 (2):305-321.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #37,060 of 740,793 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,533 of 740,793 )
How can I increase my downloads?