David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 16 (1):49 – 64 (2006)
This paper refutes the hypothesis that Shang and Zhou law or penal law originated with the Miao tribe. After examining the sociological theory that custom is the basis of law, I focus on the role of ritual-action and law in Shang and Zhou China embodied in the military, the administrative operations at court, and in the records and literature, to show that the scientific position provides a reasonable interpretation that the Shang people originated their own law. The evidence for Shang and Zhou law is examined. Finally, I critique the hypothesis for the non-Chinese origin of Shang law.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shang Jie (2008). The Phenomenology of Death. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35 (s1):133-141.
Joseph Raz (2009). Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. Oxford University Press.
Qi Zhou, An Economic Perspective on the Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake in English Contract Law: A Remedy-Based Approach.
Elliot N. Dorff (2007). For the Love of God and People: A Philosophy of Jewish Law. The Jewish Publication Society.
Eric C. Mullis (2008). Toward a Confucian Ethic of the Gift. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (2):175-194.
Yang Kung-sun (1963). The Book of Lord Shang: A Classic of the Chinese School of Law. University of Chicago Press.
Yang Shang (1928). The Book of Lord Shang. London, A. Probsthain.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #224,136 of 1,089,057 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?