David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Axiomathes 15 (4):575-597 (2005)
It is suggested that Charles Sanders Peirce's triadic semiotics provides a framework for a diagrammatic representation of a sign's proper structure. The action of signs is described at the logical and psychological levels. The role of (unconscious) abductive inference is analyzed, and a diagram of reasoning is offered. A series of interpretants transform brute facts into interpretable signs thereby providing human experience with value or meaning. The triadic structure helps in de-mystifying the relations between Penrose's three worlds when the latter are considered as constituting a semiotic triangle.
|Keywords||abduction Peirce Penrose's three worlds process ontology semiotic reality the diagrammatic reasoning the complex plane|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Mark H. Bickhard (2004). Part II: Applications of Process-Based Theories: Process and Emergence: Normative Function and Representation. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 14 (1-3):121-155.
Rick Grush & Patricia Smith Churchland (1995). Gaps in Penroses Toiling. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (1):10-29.
Ian Hacking (1990). The Taming of Chance. Cambridge University Press.
Alicia Juarrero (2000). Dynamics in Action: Intentional Behavior as a Complex System. Emergence: Complexity and Organization 2 (2):24-57.
L. Magnani (2001). Abduction, Reason, and Science. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Citations of this work BETA
Inna Semetsky (2009). The Magician in the World: Becoming, Creativity, and Transversal Communication. Zygon 44 (2):323-345.
Similar books and articles
A. J. Amos & C. D. L. Wynne (2000). The Organization of Organization: Neuronal Scaffold or Cognitive Straitjacket? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):533-534.
Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy (2003). What Proper Names, and Their Absence, Do Not Demonstrate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):288-289.
M. D'Cruz (2000). A Theory of Ordinary Proper Names. Mind 109 (436):721-756.
Daniel M. Johnson (2011). Proper Function and Defeating Experiences. Synthese 182 (3):433-447.
Michael L. Anderson (2010). Neural Reuse: A Fundamental Organizational Principle of the Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):245.
Michael Bertrand (2013). Proper Environment and the SEP Account of Biological Function. Synthese 190 (9):1503-1517.
Shawn Dawson (1998). Proper Functionalism: A Better Alternative? Religious Studies 34 (2):119-134.
Ora Matushansky (2008). On the Linguistic Complexity of Proper Names. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (5):573-627.
Eric Thomas Weber (2008). Proper Names and Persons: Peirce's Semiotic Consideration of Proper Names. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):pp. 346-362.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #161,941 of 1,699,689 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #105,649 of 1,699,689 )
How can I increase my downloads?