Quantified np's and donkey anaphora
| Abstract | (1) Mostx menx who own ay donkey beat ity. e.g. |≠M, g (1) if man = {m0, …, m9} & m0 owns & beats donkey d0, …, d9 & m1 owns & beats donkeys d10, …, d19 & m2 owns donkey d20 (only) but doesn’t beat d20.. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesJeffrey C. King (2004). Context Dependent Quantifiers and Donkey Anaphora. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34:97-127.
Stephen Neale (1990). Descriptive Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora. Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):113-150.
Irene Heim (1990). E-Type Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13 (2):137--77.
Adrian Brasoveanu (2008). Donkey Pluralities: Plural Information States Versus Non-Atomic Individuals. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (2):129-209.
Bart Geurts (2002). Donkey Business. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (2):129-156.
Mark Heller (2008). The Donkey Problem. Philosophical Studies 140 (1):83 - 101.
Philippe Schlenker (2011). Donkey Anaphora: The View From Sign Language (ASL and LSF). Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (4):341-395.
Shalom Lappin & Nissim Francez (1994). E-Type Pronouns, I-Sums, and Donkey Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (4):391 - 428.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-10-19Total downloads5 ( #160,483 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
