David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):52-71 (2007)
In a pair of recent articles, Brian Leftow and Eleonore Stump offer independent, although similar, accounts of the metaphysics of the Incarnation. Both believe that their Aquinas-inspired theories can offer solutions to the kind of Leibniz’s Law problems that can seem to threaten the logical possibility of this traditional Christian doctrine. In this paper, I’ll have a look at their compositional account of the nature of God incarnate. In the end, I believe their position can be seen to have unacceptable philosophical and theological implications, and that is it inadequate to solve the Leibniz’s law problems that motivate it in the first place
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Robin Le Poidevin (2009). Incarnation: Metaphysical Issues. Philosophy Compass 4 (4):703-714.
Similar books and articles
Alfred Freddoso (1986). Human Nature, Potency and the Incarnation. Faith and Philosophy 3 (1):27-53.
Thomas D. Senor (2007). The Compositional Account of the Incarnation. Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):52-71.
Jonathan Hill (2010). Peter Abelard's Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):27-48.
Anna Marmodoro & Jonathan Hill (eds.) (2011). The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford University Press, USA.
Thomas D. Senor (2002). Incarnation, Timelessness, and Leibniz's Law Problems. In Gregory E. Ganssle & David M. Woodruff (eds.), God and Time: Essays on the Divine Nature. Oxford University Press.
Richard Swinburne (1994). The Christian God. Oxford University Press.
Peter Forrest (2000). The Incarnation: A Philosophical Case for Kenosis. Religious Studies 36 (2):127-140.
Brian Leftow (1995). Anselm on the Necessity of the Incarnation. Religious Studies 31 (2):167 - 185.
Jonathan Hill (2008). Modeling the Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Philosophy and Theology 20 (1/2):99-128.
Thomas D. Senor (2007). The Compositional Account of the Incarnation. Faith and Philosophy 24 (01):52-71.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #127,753 of 1,100,793 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #176,465 of 1,100,793 )
How can I increase my downloads?