Review of N. Zack, Philosophy of Science and Race [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Does the concept of “race” find support in contemporary science, particularly in biology? No, says Naomi Zack, together with so many others who nowadays argue that human races lack biological reality. This claim is widely accepted in a number of fields (philosophy, biology, anthropology, and psychology), and Zack’s book represents only the latest defense of social constructivism in this context. There are several reasons why she fails to make a convincing case.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Robin O. Andreasen (2000). Race: Biological Reality or Social Construct? Philosophy of Science 67 (3):666.
Naomi Zack (2009). Race, Class, and Money in Disaster. Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (S1):84-103.
Naomi Zack (1995). Mixed Black and White Race and Public Policy. Hypatia 10 (1):120 - 132.
Naomi Zack (2005). Book Review: Philosophies of Race and Ethnicity. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (1):104-108.
Alison Bailey (2005). Book Review: Naomi Zack.Women of Color and Philosophy. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 2000. [REVIEW] Hypatia 20 (1):220-225.
J. A. I. Bewaji (1997). Book Reviews : Naomi Zack, Race and Mixed Race. Temple University Press, Philidelphia, 1993. Pp. Xv, 215. $39.95 (Cloth), $19.95 (Paper. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (3):369-373.
Naomi Zack (2010). The Fluid Symbol of Mixed Race. Hypatia 25 (4):875 - 890.
Neven Sesardic (2010). Race: A Social Destruction of a Biological Concept. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):143-162.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #45,011 of 1,008,723 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,209 of 1,008,723 )
How can I increase my downloads?