David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Biology and Philosophy 13 (3):413-426 (1998)
My aim in this paper is to take a closer look at an influential argument that purports to prove that the existence of cultural prohibitions could never be explained by biological inhibitions. The argument is two-pronged. The first prong reduces to the claim: inhibitions cannot cause prohibitions simply because inhibitions undermine the raison dêtre of prohibitions. The second strategy consists in arguing that inhibitions cannot cause prohibitions because the two differ importantly in their contents. I try to show that both claims fail.
|Keywords||insect taboos Westermarck natural selection sociobiology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Henry Jackson (1904). Prohibitions in Greek. The Classical Review 18 (05):262-263.
H. Darnley Naylor (1906). More Prohibitions in Greek. The Classical Review 20 (07):348-.
W. Headlam (1905). Greek Prohibitions. The Classical Review 19 (01):30-36.
David Gilo, The (Lack of) Economic Analysis by Courts in Israeli Antitrust Cases Concerning Restraints of Trade.
Judith N. Shklar (1990). Emerson and the Inhibitions of Democracy. Political Theory 18 (4):601-614.
Renee Cox Lorraine (2001). Music, Tendencies, and Inhibitions: Reflections on a Theory of Leonard Meyer. Scarecrow Press.
Anthony Gritten (2003). Music, Tendencies, and Inhibitions: Reflections on a Theory of Leonard Meyer. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):194-196.
Thomasine Kushner (1981). Interpretations of Life and Prohibitions Against Killing. Environmental Ethics 3 (2):147-154.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #301,596 of 1,005,816 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?