Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 67 (4):580-602 (2000)
|Abstract||Philosophers of science widely believe that the hereditarian theory about racial differences in IQ is based on methodological mistakes and confusions involving the concept of heritability. I argue that this "received view" is wrong: methodological criticisms popular among philosophers are seriously misconceived, and the discussion in philosophy of science about these matters is largely disconnected from the real, empirically complex issues debated in science|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Neven Sesardic (2010). Race: A Social Destruction of a Biological Concept. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):143-162.
Sidney J. Segalowitz (1999). Why Twin Studies Really Don't Tell Us Much About Human Heritability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):904-905.
Gry Oftedal (2005). Heritability and Genetic Causation. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):699-709.
Neven Sesardic (1993). Heritability and Causality. Philosophy of Science 60 (3):396-418.
Gry Oftedal (2007). Neven Sesardic • Making Sense of Heritability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):619-623.
Neven Sesardic (2010). Nature, Nurture, and Politics. Biology and Philosophy 25 (3):433-436.
Neven Sesardic (2003). Heritability and Indirect Causation. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1002-1014.
Neven Sesardic (2003). [Book Review: Philosophy of Science and Race]. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 70 (2):447-449.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #65,420 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?