Imperfect markets: Business ethics as an easy virtue [Book Review]
Journal of Business Ethics 13 (10):803 - 815 (1994)
|Abstract||This paper marks a radical diversion from the large body of prevailing literature in business ethics which primarily views the issue in individual-personal terms, i.e., corporate executive and employee, and suggests that making corporations more ethical would primarily come through changes in executive behavior. While this approach has strong intellectual roots in moral philosophy and religion, it fails in explaining the persistence of unethical and illegal behavior among corporations of all sizes, financial health, competitive market conditions, and, level of individual executive compensation. This paper argues for a fundamentally different approach to understanding ethical behavior, or lack thereof, among corporations and their executives. It is asserted that an overwhelmingly large rationale and/or inducement for proactive ethical business behavior is rooted in competitive aspects of particular markets, and industry structures prevailing in those markets. Furthermore, while highly competitive markets may promote efficiency, they do not guarantee ethical behavior and may indeed provide greater opportunities and incentives for unethical business behavior. Thus, by following the current prognosis, we could be wasting enormous resources in terms of teaching business ethics, and creating and imposing corporate codes of conduct. We assert that these approaches would at best make a marginal improvement in the ethical performance of corporations while at the same time exacerbate the problem by ignoring more fundamental, structural issues. Imperfect markets, with their above-market profits, are a necessary but insufficient condition for corporations to behave ethically. It is only under conditions of imperfect markets that individual executives can play an important role in guiding their corporations toward greater ethical norms. These are undertaken for a variety of reasons, including, protecting a corporation''s good name, public expectations, competitive norms, and, corporate culture and individual executive''s predilections, to name a few.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Julianne Nelson (1994). Business Ethics in a Competitive Market. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (9):663 - 666.
Paul J. Schlachter (1990). Organizational Influences on Individual Ethical Behavior in Public Accounting. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (11):839 - 853.
Robert C. Solomon (1999). A Better Way to Think About Business: How Personal Integrity Leads to Corporate Success. Oxford University Press.
Curtis C. Verschoor (1998). A Study of the Link Between a Corporation's Financial Performance and its Commitment to Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1509-1516.
Mark S. Schwartz (2012). The State of Business Ethics in Israel: A Light Unto the Nations? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 105 (4):429-446.
B. Stevens (2004). The Ethics of the US Business Executive: A Study of Perceptions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 54 (2):163 - 171.
Deborah L. Gunthorpe (1997). Business Ethics: A Quantitative Analysis of the Impact of Unethical Behavior by Publicly Traded Corporations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (5):537-543.
S. Prakash Sethi (2003). Globalization and the Good Corporation: A Need for Proactive Co-Existence. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1-2):21 - 31.
Linda M. Sama (1998). Ethical Behavior as a Strategic Choice by Large Corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (1):85-104.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,328 of 722,742 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,742 )
How can I increase my downloads?