''PF Strawson a common-sense logician at this stage makes a distinction between the notion of 'Entailment 'and the notion of 'Presupposition'. l This distinction follows from two kinds of logical absurdities. Strawson explains these logical absudities in this way: There are two statements, say 5 snd S'. Now if S'is the necessary condition for the truth simply of S and if one asserts 'S' [Book Review]

Indian Philosophical Quarterly 24 (2) (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the formalization of Strawson's presupposition.Jacek Malinowski - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):111-118.
IV. Strawson on the traditional logic.Alan Hausman - 1969 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 12 (1-4):254-259.
Two dogmatists.Charles Pigden - 1987 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 30 (1 & 2):173 – 193.
Quine, synonymy and logical truth.Robert Barrett - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):361-367.
Deleuze's Rethinking of the Notion of Sense.Daniela Voss - 2013 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 7 (1):1-25.
The uses and abuses of the personal/subpersonal distinction.Zoe Drayson - 2012 - Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):1-18.
On Strawson' Substitute for Scope.Thomas E. Patton - 1978 - Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (2):291 - 304.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
14 (#934,671)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references