David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (8):470-475 (2005)
The ethics of post-mortem organ retention and use is widely debated in bioethics and law. However, the fundamental ethical issues have often been inadequately treated. According to one argument, dead bodies are no longer “persons”. Given the great benefits dead bodies offer to human kind, they should be automatically treated as public property: when the person dies, the body becomes a public thing . This paper articulates the ethical issues involved in organ and tissue retention and use, both in the case in which the deceased’s wishes are known and in the case in which the wishes are not known. It contends that a dead body is not a republic. The state should maximise availability of organs and tissues by inviting or requiring citizens to make an informed and responsible choice on the matter
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeffrey Conyers Kirby (2009). Organ Donation: Who Should Decide?—A Canadian Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):123-128.
Jeremy Snyder (2009). Easy Rescues and Organ Transplantation. HEC Forum 21 (1):27-53.
Caroline Guibet Lafaye & Henri Kreis (2013). From Altruistic Donation to Conditional Societal Organ Appropriation After Death. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):355-368.
Jeffrey Kirby (2009). Is Context a Distortional Factor, Really? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):20-21.
Similar books and articles
A. F. Giles (1937). The Roman Republic H. W. Household: Rome, Republic and Empire. Vol. I: The Republic. Pp. Xii + 308; 3 Maps. London: Dent, 1936. Cloth, 3s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (01):28-29.
David Roochnik (2004). The Republic B. Mitchell, J. R. Lucas: An Engagement with Plato's Republic. A Companion to the Republic. Pp. XII + 177. Aldershot and Burlington, Vt: Ashgate, 2003. Paper, £15.99 (Cased, £45). Isbn: 0-7546-3366-7(0-7546-3365-9 Hbk). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 54 (02):314-.
Alastair V. Campbell (2009). The Body in Bioethics. Routledge-Cavendish.
Graham Godwyn (2006). Plato's Republic. Questions: Philosophy for Young People 6:14-14.
Helena De Preester & Manos Tsakiris (2009). Body-Extension Versus Body-Incorporation: Is There a Need for a Body-Model? [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (3):307-319.
Terry Penner (2006). The Forms in the Republic. In Gerasimos Xenophon Santas (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Plato's Republic. Blackwell Pub. 234-262.
Christopher Rowe (2006). The Literary and Philosophical Style of the Republic. In Gerasimos Xenophon Santas (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Plato's Republic. Blackwell Pub.
Michael T. Ferejohn (2006). Knowledge, Recollection, and the Forms in Republic VII. In Gerasimos Xenophon Santas (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Plato's Republic. Blackwell Pub. 214--233.
Benjamin R. Barber (2002). Cass Sunstein, Republic.Com:Republic.Com. Ethics 112 (4):866-869.
Desley Luscombe (2011). Between Sky and Water. Angelaki 16 (1):41 - 62.
Benny Shanon (2008). Mind-Body, Body-Mind: Two Distinct Problems. Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.
Londa L. Schiebinger (ed.) (2000). Feminism and the Body. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-24
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?