David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 64 (1):131-53 (1997)
Frances Egan argues that the states of computational theories of vision are individuated individualistically and, as far as the theory is concerned, are not intentional. Her argument depends on equating the goals and explanatory strategies of computational psychology with those of its algorithmic level. However, closer inspection of computational psychology reveals that the computational level plays an essential role in explaining visual processes and that explanations at this level are nonindividualistic and intentional. In conclusion, I sketch an account of content in which content does the sort of explanatory work that Egan denies is possible
|Keywords||Computational Content Individualism Science Vision Egan, F|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Frances Egan (2010). Computational Models: A Modest Role for Content. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):253-259.
Arnold Silverberg (2006). Chomsky and Egan on Computational Theories of Vision. Minds and Machines 16 (4):495-524.
P. Morton (1993). Supervenience and Computational Explanation in Vision Theory. Philosophy of Science 60 (1):86-99.
Lawrence A. Shapiro (1993). Content, Kinds, and Individualism in Marr's Theory of Vision. Philosophical Review 102 (4):489-513.
Keith Butler (1998). Content, Computation, and Individuation. Synthese 114 (2):277-92.
Mark Sprevak (2010). Computation, Individuation, and the Received View on Representation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):260-270.
Oron Shagrir (2006). Why We View the Brain as a Computer. Synthese 153 (3):393-416.
Oron Shagrir (2001). Content, Computation and Externalism. Mind 110 (438):369-400.
Oron Shagrir (2010). Marr on Computational-Level Theories. Philosophy of Science 77 (4):477-500.
Paul Bohan Broderick, Johannes Lenhard & Arnold Silverberg (2006). Dispositional Versus Epistemic Causality. Minds and Machines 16 (3).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #84,747 of 1,018,166 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #65,321 of 1,018,166 )
How can I increase my downloads?