David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 28 (02):243- (1978)
As was first pointed out by Gercke, there are close parallels, which clearly suggest a common source, between Apuleius, de Platone 1.12, the treatise On Fate falsely attributed to Plutarch, Calcidius' excursus on fate in his commentary on Plato's Timaeus, and certain sections of the treatise de Natura hominis by Nemesius. Gercke traced the doctrines common to these works to the school of Gaius; recently however Dillon has pointed out that, while Albinus shares with these works the characteristic Middle-Platonic notion of fate as conditional or hypothetical – our actions are free, but once we have acted the consequences of our actions are fated and inevitable – he does not share certain other common features, such as the identification of fate as substance with the world-soul and the hierarchy of three providences
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
R. W. Sharples (1975). Aristotelian and Stoic Conceptions of Necessity in the "De Fato" of Alexander of Aphrodisias. Phronesis 20 (3):247 - 274.
R. W. Sharples (1975). Aristotelian and Stoic Conceptions of Necessity in the De Fato of Alexander of Aphrodisias. Phronesis 20 (3):247-274.
Richard Gaskin (1993). Alexander's Sea Battle: A Discussion of Alexander of Aphrodisias "De Fato" 10. Phronesis 38 (1):75 - 94.
Richard Gaskin (1993). Alexander's Sea Battle: A Discussion of Alexander of Aphrodisias De Fato 10. Phronesis 38 (1):75-94.
A. A. Long (1975). Alexander of Aphrodisias, De Fato 190. 26 Ff. Classical Quarterly 25 (01):158-.
Dorothea Frede (1982). The Dramatization of Determinism: Alexander of Aphrodisias' De Fato. Phronesis 27 (3):276-298.
A. A. Long (1970). Stoic Determinism and Alexander of Aphrodisias De Fato (I-Xiv). Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 52 (3):247-268.
Robert B. Todd (1976). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics: A Study of the De Mixtione with Preliminary Essays, Text, Translation and Commentary. Brill.
H. J. Blumenthal (1991). Alexander of Aphrodisias' Ethical Problems R. W. Sharples (Tr.): Alexander of Aphrodisias, Ethical Problems. (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle.) Pp. 145. London: Duckworth, 1990. £24. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (02):320-322.
D. Frank (1996). Review. Alexander of Aphrodisias. Alexander of Aphrodisias, Quaestiones 2.16-3.15. R W Sharples (Tr). The Classical Review 46 (2):235-236.
Jonathan Barnes & Susanne Bobzien (1991). Alexander of Aphrodisias' on Aristotle's Prior Analytics 1.1-7. Duckworth.
Luca Gili (2012). Alexander of Aphrodisias's Solution to the Puzzle of the Two Modal Barbaras: A Semantic Approach. Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 23:35-64.
Dorothea Frede (1982). The Dramatization of Determinism: Alexander of Aphrodisias' "De Fato". Phronesis 27 (3):276 - 298.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads6 ( #302,951 of 1,700,362 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,700,362 )
How can I increase my downloads?