David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Behavior 19 (5):432-447 (2009)
This article is a reconsideration of Tesch's (1977) ethical, educational, and methodological functions for debriefing through a literature review and an Internet survey of authors of articles published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of Traumatic Stress . We advocate for a larger ethical role for debriefing in nondeception research. The educational function of debriefing is examined in light of the continued popularity of undergraduate participant pools. A case is made for the methodological function of debriefing to clarify aspects of research participation. Recommendations are made to improve the conducting and reporting of debriefings
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Roseanna Sommers & Franklin G. Miller (2013). Forgoing Debriefing in Deceptive Research: Is It Ever Ethical? Ethics and Behavior 23 (2):98-116.
Similar books and articles
Cathy Faye & Donald Sharpe (2009). A Second Look at Debriefing Practices: Madness in Our Method? Ethics and Behavior 19 (5):432-447.
Franklin G. Miller John P. Gluck David Wendler Jr (2008). Debriefing and Accountability in Deceptive Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):pp. 235-251.
Bryan Benham (2008). Moral Accountability and Debriefing. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):pp. 253-273.
Janet L. Brody, John P. Gluck & Alfredo S. Aragon (2000). Participants' Understanding of the Process of Psychological Research: Debriefing. Ethics and Behavior 10 (1):13 – 25.
Joan E. Sieber, Rebecca Iannuzzo & Beverly Rodriguez (1995). Deception Methods in Psychology: Have They Changed in 23 Years? Ethics and Behavior 5 (1):67 – 85.
Allan J. Kimmel (2001). Ethical Trends in Marketing and Psychological Research. Ethics and Behavior 11 (2):131 – 149.
David T. Dearman & James E. Beard (2009). Ethical Issues in Accounting and Economics Experimental Research: Inducing Strategic Misrepresentation. Ethics and Behavior 19 (1):51 – 59.
Celia B. Fisher (2005). Deception Research Involving Children: Ethical Practices and Paradoxes. Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):271 – 287.
Debjani Mukherjee (2011). Learning From Lingering Angst. Hastings Center Report 41 (3):9-10.
Amedeo D'Angiulli & Lavonia Smith LeBeau (2002). On Boredom and Experimentation in Humans. Ethics and Behavior 12 (2):167 – 176.
Franklin G. Miller, John P. Gluck Jr & David Wendler (2008). Debriefing and Accountability in Deceptive Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):235-251.
Donald L. Mosher & Susan B. Bond (1992). "Little Rapes," Specious Claims, and Moral Hubris: A Reply to Korn, Huelsman, Reed, and Aiello. Ethics and Behavior 2 (2):109 – 121.
Adam Oliansky (1991). A Confederate's Perspective on Deception. Ethics and Behavior 1 (4):253 – 258.
Sandra T. Sigmon (1995). Ethical Practices and Beliefs of Psychopathology Researchers. Ethics and Behavior 5 (4):295 – 309.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads2 ( #678,026 of 1,793,059 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,661 of 1,793,059 )
How can I increase my downloads?