Burali-Forti's revenge
In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNicholas J. J. Smith (2000). The Principle of Uniform Solution (of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference). Mind 109 (433):117-122.
Thomas Forster & Thierry Libert (2010). An Order-Theoretic Account of Some Set-Theoretic Paradoxes. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):1-19.
Loïc Colson (2007). Another Paradox in Naive Set-Theory. Studia Logica 85 (1):33 - 39.
K. Grelling & L. Nelson (1907/1908). Bemerkungen Zu den Paradoxien von Russell Und Burali-Forti. Abhandlungen Der Fries'schen Schule (Neue Serie) 2:300-334.
G. Hellman (2011). On the Significance of the Burali-Forti Paradox. Analysis 71 (4):631-637.
A. Hazen (1986). Logical Objects and the Paradox of Burali-Forti. Erkenntnis 24 (3):283 - 291.
Barkley Rosser (1942). The Burali-Forti Paradox. Journal of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):1-17.
Irving M. Copi (1958). The Burali-Forti Paradox. Philosophy of Science 25 (4):281-286.
Christopher Menzel (1984). Cantor and the Burali-Forti Paradox. The Monist 67 (1):92-107.
Keith Simmons (2007). Revenge and Context. In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
