Analysis 68 (299):226–234 (2008)
|Abstract||In this paper I prove that holistic coherentism is logically equivalent to the conjunction of symmetry and quasi-transitivity of epistemic support and a condition on justified beliefs. On the way I defend Tom Stoneham from a criticism made by Darrell Rowbottom and prove a premiss of Stoneham’s argument to be an entailment of coherentism.|
|Keywords||coherentism epistemic support holistic coherentism|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Stern (2004). Coherence as a Test for Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):296–326.
Jonathan Kvanvig (1997). In Defense of Coherentism. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:299-306.
T. Shogenji (2001). The Role of Coherence in Epistemic Justification. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):90 – 106.
Thomas Grundmann (1999). BonJour's Self-Defeating Argument for Coherentism. Erkenntnis 50 (2-3):463-479.
Yves Bouchard (2007). The Foundationalism–Coherentism Opposition Revisited: The Case for Complementarism. Foundations of Science 12 (4).
Tom Stoneham (2007). A Reductio of Coherentism. Analysis 67 (295):254–257.
Jonathan Kvanvig (1995). Coherentists' Distractions. Philosophical Topics 23 (1):257-274.
Peter Murphy, Coherentism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
William Roche (2012). A Reply to Cling's “The Epistemic Regress Problem”. Philosophical Studies 159 (2):263-276.
Joseph Shieber (2002). The Epistemic Centrality of Testimony and the Coherence of Epistemological Coherentism. In Yves Bouchard (ed.), Perspectives on Coherentism.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #34,173 of 549,128 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,128 )
How can I increase my downloads?