Civic Biology and the Origin of the School Antievolution Movement
Journal of the History of Biology 41 (3):409 - 433 (2008)
| Abstract | In discussing the origins of the antievolution movement in American high schools within the framework of science and religion, much is overlooked about the influence of educational trends in shaping this phenomenon. This was especially true in the years before the 1925 Scopes trial, the beginnings of the school antievolution movement. There was no sudden realization in the 1920's – sixty years after the "Origin of Species" was published – that Darwinism conflicted with the Bible, but until evolution was being taught in the high schools, there was no impetus to outlaw it. The creation of "civic biology" curricula in the late 1910's and early 20's, spearheaded by a close-knit community of textbook authors, brought evolution into the high school classroom as part of a complete reshaping of "biology" as a school subject. It also incorporated progressive ideologies about the purposes of compulsory public education in shaping society, and civic biology was fundamentally focused on the applications of the life sciences to human life. Antievolution legislation was part of a broader response to the ideologies of the new biology field, and was a reaction not only to the content of the new subject, but to the increasingly centralized control and regulation of education. Viewing the early school antievolution movement through the science-religion conflict is an artifact of the Scopes trial's re-creation of its origins. What largely caused support for the school antievolution movement in the South and particularly Tennessee were concerns over public education, which biology came to epitomize. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesC. Renwick (forthcoming). Response to Steven T. Casper and Steve Fuller. Philosophy of the Social Sciences.
Larry Cuban (1999). The Integration of Modern Sciences Into the American Secondary School, 1890--1990s. Studies in Philosophy and Education 18 (1):67-87.
Kenneth M. Ludmerer (2011). Abraham Flexner and Medical Education. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 54 (1).
Carlo Ierna (2009). Anton Marty and the Phenomenological Movement. Brentano-Studien 12:219-240.
John Dewey (1980). The School and Society. Feffer & Simons.
Alison Kraft (2004). Pragmatism, Patronage and Politics in English Biology: The Rise and Fall of Economic Biology 1904-1920. Journal of the History of Biology 37 (2):213 - 258.
C. Renwick (forthcoming). Completing the Circle of the Social Sciences? William Beveridge and Social Biology at London School of Economics During the 1930s. Philosophy of the Social Sciences.
Michael J. Reiss (1995). Conflicting Philosophies of School Sex Education. Journal of Moral Education 24 (4):371-382.
William Hayes (2006). The Progressive Education Movement: Is It Still a Factor in Today's Schools? Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Michael Fielding (2013). Whole School Meetings and the Development of Radical Democratic Community. Studies in Philosophy and Education 32 (2):123-140.
David Hartley (2003). The Instrumentalisation of the Expressive in Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (1):6 - 19.
Addy Pross (2012). What is Life?: How Chemistry Becomes Biology. Oxford University Press.
Ronald B. Jacobson (2012). Rethinking School Bullying: Dominance, Identity and School Culture. Routledge.
Ann Higgins (1995). Teaching as a Moral Activity: Listening to Teachers in Russia and the United States. Journal of Moral Education 24 (2):143-158.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-05-29Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
