David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Clinical Ethics 4 (4):181-186 (2009)
Current General Medical Council guidelines state that any doctor who does not wish to carry out a non-therapeutic circumcision (NTC) on a boy must invoke conscientious objection. This paper argues that this is illogical, as it is clear that an ethical doctor will object to conducting a clinically unnecessary operation on a child who cannot consent simply because of the parents’ religious beliefs. Comparison of the GMC guidelines with the more sensible British Medical Association guidance reveals that both are biased in favour of NTC and subvert standard consent procedures. It is further argued that any doctor who does participate in non-therapeutic circumcision of a minor may be guilty of negligence and in breach of the Human Rights Act. In fact, the GMC guidance implies that doctors must claim conscientious objection if they do not wish to be negligent. Both sets of guidelines should be changed to ensure an objective consent process and avoid confusion over the ethics of NTC.
|Keywords||Clinical ethics Circumcision Consent Children|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
M. Fox (2005). A Covenant with the Status Quo? Male Circumcision and the New BMA Guidance to Doctors. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (8):463-469.
Armand H. Matheny Antommaria (2003). I Paid Out-of-Pocket for My Son's Circumcision at Happy Valley Tattoo and Piercing: Alternative Framings of the Debate Over Routine Neonatal Male Circumcision. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):50-52.
Cheryl M. Sterling & Gary A. Walco (2003). Protection of Children's Rights to Self-Determination in Research. Ethics and Behavior 13 (3):237 – 247.
British Medical Association (2004). The Law and Ethics of Male Circumcision: Guidance for Doctors. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):259-263.
T. M. Wilkinson (2001). Parental Consent and the Use of Dead Children's Bodies. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):337-358.
Sonja Grover (2003). On the Limits of Parental Proxy Consent: Children's Right to Non-Participation in Non-Therapeutic Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (4):349-383.
R. Mussell (2004). The Development of Professional Guidelines on the Law and Ethics of Male Circumcision. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):254-258.
Margherita Brusa & Y. Michael Barilan (2009). Cultural Circumcision in Eu Public Hospitals – an Ethical Discussion. Bioethics 23 (8):470-482.
Michael Benatar & David Benatar (2003). Between Prophylaxis and Child Abuse: The Ethics of Neonatal Male Circumcision. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):35-48.
Thomas Szasz (1996). Routine Neonatal Circumcision: Symbol of the Birth of the Therapeutic State. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):137-148.
Added to index2009-06-11
Total downloads34 ( #124,679 of 1,934,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,883 of 1,934,815 )
How can I increase my downloads?