David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Fowler Pip, Strongman Luke & Kobeleva Polly (eds.), Writing the Future. Tertiary Writing Network (2011)
Heidegger’s hermeneutic method and his account of pedagogy are useful in teaching students how to think and write. This paper interprets the method of thinking which Martin Heidegger taught to his students and indicates strategies that have been used to introduce that method to New Zealand students in an online course. The method appears to philosophers as a technique of conceptual analysis, although Heidegger may not have agreed with that characterisation or its use in this way. To tertiary teachers it is one framework that they may use to teach a strategy and techniques under the rubric of critical thinking. The use of the method of procedure proposed is well within the capabilities of teachers in practical subjects such as business, management, medicine and law. Students in the author’s business analysis course say that a hermeneutic strategy forces them to struggle, but ultimately they report satisfaction at their increased abilities and believe that they have gained something efficacious.
|Keywords||Curriculum Business Hermeneutics Heidegger Writing Pedagogy Critical thinking|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dawn C. Riley (2011). Heidegger Teaching: An Analysis and Interpretation of Pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (8):797-815.
Mark Wildschut (2005). Heidegger Into D(E)Ut(s)Ch. Studia Phaenomenologica 5:53-67.
John C. Cassidy (2006). A Pedagogy for Integrating Catholic Social Ethics Into the Business Ethics Course. Journal of Business Ethics Education 3:35-54.
Robert Keith Shaw & Dan Love (2007). A Heideggerian Analysis in the Teaching of Science to Maori Students. He Kupu 1 (3):31-43.
Iain Thomson (2007). On the Advantages and Disadvantages of Reading Heidegger Backwards: White's Time and Death. Inquiry 50 (1):103 – 120.
Robert Shaw (2013). The Implications for Science Education of Heidegger's Philosophy of Science. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (5):546-570.
Joseph J. Kockelmans (ed.) (1972). On Heidegger and Language. Evanston [Ill.]Northwestern University Press.
Mark J. Palombo (2005). Case Method in a Graduate Children's Literature Course to Foster Critical Thinking. Inquiry 24 (3):17-20.
Gavin Rae (2010). Re-Thinking the Human: Heidegger, Fundamental Ontology, and Humanism. [REVIEW] Human Studies 33 (1):23-39.
Daniel O. Dahlstrom (ed.) (2011). Interpreting Heidegger: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Avery Goldman (2010). Kant, Heidegger, and the Circularity of Transcendental Inquiry. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (1):107-120.
David Wood (2002). Thinking After Heidegger. Blackwell Publishers.
Tyler Klaskow (2011). Looking for Intentionality with Heidegger. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 15 (1):94-109.
Robert Keith Shaw (2007). Pedagogic Thinking That Grounds E-Learning for Secondary School Science Students in New Zealand. E-Learning and Digital Media 4 (4):471-481.
Gert-Jan van der Heiden (2011). Announcement, Attestation, and Equivocity. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (3):415-432.
Added to index2011-08-06
Total downloads24 ( #168,428 of 1,934,364 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,317 of 1,934,364 )
How can I increase my downloads?