David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 28 (1-4):119 – 122 (1985)
Peter Winch's The Idea of a Social Science has been the subject of repeated misunderstanding. This discussion takes one recent example and shows how Winch's argument is gravely distorted. What is at issue is not, as is usually supposed, whether we can accept or endorse another society's explanations of its activities, but whether we have to look for an explanatory connection between concepts and action. Winch's argument is that before we can try to explain actions, we have to identify them correctly. This can only be done by seeing how they, and the concepts they are associated with, fit within a way of life. Grasping its rule?following character is understanding action. Once the difficulties in making such identifications are appreciated, we will be less inclined to accept facile explanations why people in other societies do the things they do
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Mark B. Okrent (1984). Hermeneutics, Transcendental Philosophy and Social Science. Inquiry 27 (1-4):23 – 49.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Winch (ed.) (1969). Studies in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. New York, Humanities P..
Peter Winch & Raimond Gaita (eds.) (1990). Value and Understanding: Essays for Peter Winch. Routledge.
Arnold Levison (1966). Knowledge and Society. Inquiry 9 (1-4):132 – 146.
Philip Pettit (2000). Winch's Double-Edged Idea of a Social Science. History of the Human Sciences 13 (1):63-77.
Howard Mounce (2011). Winch and Anscombe on Ethics and Religion. Philosophical Investigations 34 (3):241-248.
Berel Dov Lerner (1995). Understanding a (Secular) Primitive Society. Religious Studies 31 (3):303 - 309.
Craig Taylor (2006). Winch on Moral Dilemmas and Moral Modality. Inquiry 49 (2):148 – 157.
J. G. Gunnell (2010). Winch Reassessed. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4):616-622.
Berel Dov Lerner (1995). Winch and Instrumental Pluralism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (2):180-191.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads15 ( #112,733 of 1,099,911 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #90,387 of 1,099,911 )
How can I increase my downloads?