Inquiry 28 (1-4):119 – 122 (1985)
|Abstract||Peter Winch's The Idea of a Social Science has been the subject of repeated misunderstanding. This discussion takes one recent example and shows how Winch's argument is gravely distorted. What is at issue is not, as is usually supposed, whether we can accept or endorse another society's explanations of its activities, but whether we have to look for an explanatory connection between concepts and action. Winch's argument is that before we can try to explain actions, we have to identify them correctly. This can only be done by seeing how they, and the concepts they are associated with, fit within a way of life. Grasping its rule?following character is understanding action. Once the difficulties in making such identifications are appreciated, we will be less inclined to accept facile explanations why people in other societies do the things they do|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Winch (1969). Studies in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. New York, Humanities P..
Berel Dov Lerner (1995). Winch and Instrumental Pluralism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (2):180-191.
J. G. Gunnell (2010). Winch Reassessed. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4):616-622.
Craig Taylor (2006). Winch on Moral Dilemmas and Moral Modality. Inquiry 49 (2):148 – 157.
Berel Dov Lerner (1995). Understanding a (Secular) Primitive Society. Religious Studies 31 (3):303 - 309.
Howard Mounce (2011). Winch and Anscombe on Ethics and Religion. Philosophical Investigations 34 (3):241-248.
Arnold Levison (1966). Knowledge and Society. Inquiry 9 (1-4):132 – 146.
Peter Winch & Raimond Gaita (eds.) (1990). Value and Understanding: Essays for Peter Winch. Routledge.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads11 ( #99,698 of 551,112 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,341 of 551,112 )
How can I increase my downloads?