Justifying Atonement: An Anselmian Response to Modern Critics

Saint Anselm Journal 6 (2):1 - 19 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper considers three modern objections to Anselm’s argument on atonement in book I of ’Cur Deus Homo’. The objections are from Friedrich Nietzsche, R. C. Moberly, and Hastings Rashdall; each one makes the case that Anselm’s argument is fallacious. Each one interprets Anselm’s position as requiring that someone innocent suffer punishment in order to acquit guilt. I contend that these objectors do not offer a strong case against Anselm’s argument, principally because they have not examined it completely and have misunderstood his reasoning. In fine, Anselm’s case is (a) the Son’s obedience to the Father suffices for atonement, (b) the Son is an advocate for Adam and his heirs and stands in for them because of his blood ties to humanity, and (c) the Son is the advocate for the Father in the latter’s attempt to end human estrangement from justice. Being both an advocate of the Father and an heir to Adam, the Son’s Incarnation itself prepares the way of reconciliation and the life of

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anselm on Atonement.David Brown - 2004 - In Brian Leftow (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press.
Christian Atonement and Kantian Justification.Philip L. Quinn - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (4):440-462.
Stump on the Nature of Atonement.E. J. Coffman - 2012 - In Kelly James Clark & Michael Rea (eds.), Science, Religion, and Metaphysics: New Essays on the Philosophy of Alvin Plantinga. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 144-151.
Anselm on the Beauty of the Incarnation.Brian Leftow - 1995 - Modern Schoolman 72 (2-3):109 - 124.
Swinburne on Atonement.Steven S. Aspenson - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (2):187 - 204.
In Defense of Anselm.Mark Owen Webb - 2005 - Philo 8 (1):55-58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-16

Downloads
2 (#1,628,810)

6 months
1 (#1,027,696)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel E. Shannon
DePauw University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references