Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):311-329 (2007)
|Abstract||There are striking parallels, largely unexplored in the literature, between skeptical arguments against theism and against moral realism. After sketching four arguments meant to do this double duty, I restrict my attention to an explanatory argument that claims that we have most reason to deny the existence of moral facts (and so, by extrapolation, theistic ones), because such putative facts have no causal-explanatory power. I reject the proposed parity, and offer reasons to think that the potential vulnerabilities of moral realism on this front are quite different from those of the theist. Key Words: causal power explanatory power Gilbert Harman moral facts moral realism theism.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Devitt (2002). Moral Realism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):1-15.
Elizabeth Tropman (2012). Can Cornell Moral Realism Adequately Account for Moral Knowledge? Theoria 78 (1):26-46.
David Enoch (2009). How is Moral Disagreement a Problem for Realism? Journal of Ethics 13 (1):15 - 50.
Mark T. Nelson (2006). Moral Realism and Program Explanation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (3):417 – 428.
Neil Sinclair (2011). The Explanationist Argument for Moral Realism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):1-24.
Joseph Millum (2008). A Biological Alternative to Moral Explanations. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):385-407.
Stefan Sencerz (1995). Personal Goodness and Moral Facts. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:481-498.
Russ Shafer-Landau (2003/2005). Moral Realism: A Defence. Oxford University Press.
Don Loeb (2005). Moral Explanations of Moral Beliefs. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):193–208.
Chris Heathwood (2009). Moral and Epistemic Open-Question Arguments. Philosophical Books 50:83-98.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads73 ( #11,395 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,228 of 549,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?