Molecular materials and its technology: disruptive impact on industrial and socio-economic areas [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
AI and Society 21 (3):303-313 (2006)
This paper discusses the economic, health and social potential of nanotechnology. This involves the development of techniques for the manipulation of matter at the atomic and molecular levels. These new materials can perform multiple functions and be economically produced in large quantities, and hence have the potential for replacing existing technologies and materials in socially and economically disruptive ways. The paper raises some ethical, social and moral concerns arising from the capabilities of such materials, and discusses possible ways to regulate the growth of nanotechnology and allow the society to reap the benefits
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alfred Nordmann (2009). Invisible Origins of Nanotechnology: Herbert Gleiter, Materials Science, and Questions of Prestige. Perspectives on Science 17 (2):pp. 123-143.
Francois Berger, Sjef Gevers, Ludwig Siep & Klaus-Michael Weltring (2008). Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of Brain-Implants Using Nano-Scale Materials and Techniques. NanoEthics 2 (3):241-249.
Arthur MacEwan (1995). Technological Options and Free Trade Agreements. Science and Society 59 (1):9 - 37.
Emanuel Bertrand & Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent (2011). Materials Research in France: A Short-Lived National Initiative (1982–1994). Minerva 49 (2):191-214.
Katherine Rowden & Bradley Striebig (2004). Incorporating Environmental Ethics Into the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):417-422.
Meri Koivusalo (2006). The Impact of Economic Globalisation on Health. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (1):13-34.
Robert Sparrow (2009). The Social Impacts of Nanotechnology: An Ethical and Political Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):13-23.
L. G. Sterling, C. K. Halbrendt & S. L. Kitto (1993). Impact of Education on the Attitudes of College Students Toward Biotechnology. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6 (1):75-88.
Rosalyn W. Berne (2004). Towards the Conscientious Development of Ethical Nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):627-638.
Evisa Kica & Diana M. Bowman (2013). Transnational Governance Arrangements: Legitimate Alternatives to Regulating Nanotechnologies? [REVIEW] NanoEthics 7 (1):69-82.
M. Richards (2001). How Distinctive is Genetic Information? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):663-687.
Joseph F. Coates (1982). Computers and Business — a Case of Ethical Overload. Journal of Business Ethics 1 (3):239 - 248.
Clare Shelley-Egan (2010). The Ambivalence of Promising Technology. NanoEthics 4 (2):183-189.
Matthew Wilks Keefer (2005). Making Good Use of Online Case Study Materials. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):413-429.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads3 ( #333,674 of 1,410,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,589 of 1,410,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?