Graduate studies at Western
Ethics 107 (4):584-611 (1997)
|Abstract||The traditional conception of ethical theory sees it as the project of developing a coherent set of rules from which one can infer all determinate moral verdicts. I am not optimistic about the prospects for constructing such a theory. To explain this pessimism, we need to understand what moral rules are and what roles they might play in ethical theory|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gabriela Remow (2007). General Rules in the Moral Theories of Smith and Hume. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (2):119-134.
Jean Porter (1995). Moral Action and Christian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Michael B. Gill & Shaun Nichols (2008). Sentimentalist Pluralism: Moral Psychology and Philosophical Ethics. Philosophical Issues 18 (1):143-163.
John W. Hennessey & Bernard Gert (1985). Moral Rules and Moral Ideals: A Useful Distinction in Business and Professional Practice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 4 (2):105 - 115.
Jean Porter (1989). Moral Rules and Moral Actions: A Comparison of Aquinas and Modern Moral Theology. Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (1):123 - 149.
Jean Chambers (2001). A Cybernetic Theory of Morality and Moral Autonomy. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):177-192.
Alan H. Goldman (2001). Practical Rules: When We Need Them and When We Don't. Cambridge University Press.
Russ Shafer-Landau (2010). The Fundamentals of Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Adam Cureton (2012). Solidarity and Social Moral Rules. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):691-706.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads51 ( #24,495 of 739,391 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,464 of 739,391 )
How can I increase my downloads?