Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):265–277 (2008)
|Abstract||Critics of attempts to explain meaning in terms of truth-conditions have tended to charge their opponents with misconceptions regarding truth. I shall argue that the 'naïve' version of the truth-conditional theory which best accounts for its resilience fails for a different and more basic reason, namely, circularity arising from the contingency of meaning. One reason why this problem has been overlooked is a tendency (noted by Dummett in a different connection) to assimilate the naïve truth-conditional theory to an idealized verificationism.|
|Keywords||contingency of meaning Dummett verificationism|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Anne Bezuidenhout (2002). Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. Philosophical Perspectives 16:105-134.
D. E. Over (1981). Game Theoretical Semantics and Entailment. Studia Logica 40 (1):67 - 74.
Richard Heck (2002). Meaning and Truth-Conditions: A Reply to Kemp. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (206):82–87.
Paul Horwich (2010). Truth-Meaning-Reality. Oxford University Press.
Panu Raatikainen (2008). On Rules of Inference and the Meanings of Logical Constants. Analysis 68 (300):282-287.
Douglas Patterson (2005). Deflationism and the Truth Conditional Theory of Meaning. Philosophical Studies 124 (3):271 - 294.
Heather Dyke (2003). Tensed Meaning: A Tenseless Account. Journal of Philosophical Research 28:65-81.
WR Stirton (1997). Anti-Realism, Truth-Conditions and Verificationism. Mind 106 (424):697-716.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #29,866 of 549,510 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?