Platonizing the abstract self

Abstract

In this note I examine the two main differences between Plato's and Dennett's views of the self as an abstract object. I point out that in the presence of certain forms of ontological realism, abstract-object theories of the self are compatible with the full reality of the self. I conclude with some remarks on the relationship between ontology and ethics.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Awareness of Abstract Objects.Elijah Chudnoff - 2012 - Noûs 47 (4):706-726.
Is God an abstract object?Brian Leftow - 1990 - Noûs 24 (4):581-598.
Platonism in metaphysics.Mark Balaguer - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Pretense, existence, and fictional objects.Anthony Everett - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):56–80.
Remarks on Platonized Naturalism.Bernard Linsky - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):3-15.
Composite Objects and the Abstract/Concrete Distinction.Daniel A. Kaufman - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:215-238.
Abstract Artifacts in Pretence.Sarah Sawyer - 2002 - Philosophical Papers 31 (2):183-198.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
273 (#70,519)

6 months
56 (#73,598)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Real patterns.Daniel C. Dennett - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):27-51.
Real Patterns.Daniel C. Dennett - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):27-51.

Add more references