|Abstract||In this note I examine the two main differences between Plato's and Dennett's views of the self as an abstract object. I point out that in the presence of certain forms of ontological realism, abstract-object theories of the self are compatible with the full reality of the self. I conclude with some remarks on the relationship between ontology and ethics.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Elijah Chudnoff (2013). Awareness of Abstract Objects. Noûs 47 (4):706-726.
Brian Leftow (1990). Is God an Abstract Object? Noûs 24 (4):581-598.
Mark Balaguer, Platonism in Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Anthony Everett (2007). Pretense, Existence, and Fictional Objects. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):56–80.
Bernard Linsky (2005). Remarks on Platonized Naturalism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):3-15.
Daniel A. Kaufman (2002). Composite Objects and the Abstract/Concrete Distinction. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:215-238.
Stathis Psillos (2011). Living with the Abstract: Realism and Models. Synthese 180 (1):3 - 17.
Sarah Sawyer (2002). Abstract Artifacts in Pretence. Philosophical Papers 31 (2):183-198.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #40,539 of 722,787 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #9,259 of 722,787 )
How can I increase my downloads?