Re-formulating the Correspondence Principle: Problems and Prospects
Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):99-115 (2008)
| Abstract | The generalized correspondence principle is the assertion of something like the following methodological norm: successor theories ought to incorporate precursor theories as special cases. However, the actual core connotation of this principle seems to be that when we are constructing new theories in some domain of application we ought to retain as much of prior but refuted theories as is possible while eliminating inconsistency with the data. As a result, it is argued here that the correspondence principle has not been correctly formulated. Also, it is argued here that there is no compelling extant justification of this proposed methodological norm. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Friedel Weinert (1994). The Correspondence Principle and the Closure of Theories. Erkenntnis 40 (3):303 - 323.
Neil A. Manson (2002). Formulating the Precautionary Principle. Environmental Ethics 24 (3):263-274.
Neil A. Manson (2002). Formulating the Precautionary Principle. Environmental Ethics 24 (3):263-274.
Patricia Marino (2006). What Should a Correspondence Theory Be and Do? Philosophical Studies 127 (3):415 - 457.
Lieven Decock (2008). The Conceptual Basis of Numerical Abilities: One-to-One Correspondence Versus the Successor Relation. Philosophical Psychology 21 (4):459 – 473.
Per-erik Malmnäs (1994). Axiomatic Justifications of the Utility Principle: A Formal Investigation. Synthese 99 (2):233 - 249.
Hans Radder (1991). Heuristics and the Generalized Correspondence Principle. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):195-226.
Stephan Hartmann (2008). Modeling High-Temperature Superconductors: Correspondence at Bay? In Lena Soler (ed.), Rethinking Scientific Change. Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities? Springer.
Michael J. Shaffer (2008). Re-Formulating The Generalized Correspondence Principle. Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):99-115.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-08-05Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

