David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 65 (2):121 - 147 (2006)
This paper argues that commitment to the Dominant Social Paradigm (DSP) in Western societies, which includes support for such ideologies as free enterprise, private property rights, economic individualism, and unlimited economic growth, poses a threat to progress in imposing greater standards of corporate environmental accountability. It is hypothesized that commitment to the DSP will be negatively correlated with support for the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) and support for corporate environmental accountability, and that belief in the NEP will be positively correlated with support for corporate environmental accountability. The findings, based on a survey of MBA students, are generally consistent with the hypotheses.
|Keywords||corporate environmental accountability Dominant Social Paradigm New Ecological Paradigm|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Olivier Boiral, Mario Cayer & Charles M. Baron (2009). The Action Logics of Environmental Leadership: A Developmental Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):479 - 499.
Liviu Florea, Yu Ha Cheung & Neil C. Herndon (2013). For All Good Reasons: Role of Values in Organizational Sustainability. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 114 (3):393-408.
Maya Morioka Todeschini (2011). “Webs of Engagement”: Managerial Responsibility in a Japanese Company. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 101 (S1):45-59.
Olivier Boiral, Charles Baron & Olen Gunnlaugson (2013). Environmental Leadership and Consciousness Development: A Case Study Among Canadian SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics:1-21.
Rachel Wolfgramm, Sian Flynn-Coleman & Denise Conroy (forthcoming). Dynamic Interactions of Agency in Leadership (DIAL): An Integrative Framework for Analysing Agency in Sustainability Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics.
Similar books and articles
Lance McMahon (1995). Corporate Accountability in Australia: Managing the Information Environment for Corporate Accountability. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (8):673 - 681.
Sungchul Choi & Alex Ng (2011). Environmental and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability and Price Effects on Consumer Responses. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):269-282.
Peter Pruzan (1998). From Control to Values-Based Management and Accountability. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1379-1394.
John M. Gowdy (1994). Progress and Environmental Sustainability. Environmental Ethics 16 (1):41-55.
William S. Laufer (2003). Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):253 - 261.
Denis Cormier, Irene M. Gordon & Michel Magnan (2004). Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Contrasting Management's Perceptions with Reality. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 49 (2):143-165.
David A. Gruenewald (2005). Accountability and Collaboration: Institutional Barriers and Strategic Pathways for Place-Based Education. Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (3):261 – 283.
Anita Jose & Shang-Mei Lee (2007). Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis Based on Website Disclosures. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 72 (4):307 - 321.
Vassilios P. Filios (1985). Assessment of Attitudes Toward Corporate Social Accountability in Britain. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (3):155 - 173.
Kyoko Fukukawa, William E. Shafer & Grace Meina Lee (2007). Values and Attitudes Toward Social and Environmental Accountability: A Study of MBA Students. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 71 (4):381 - 394.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #128,915 of 1,089,063 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,063 )
How can I increase my downloads?