The End of the Teapot Argument for Atheism (and All Its Tawdry Imitators)

Abstract
Atheists sometimes use Bertrand Russell's teapot argument, and its variants with other objects in place of the teapot, to argue for the rationality of atheism. In this paper I show that this use of the teapot argument and its variants is unacceptably circular. The circularity arises because there is indirect evidence against the objects invoked in the arguments.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Mark Sharlow, The End of the Teapot Argument for Atheism (and All Its Tawdry Imitators)
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Anthony Grafton (2004). A Note From Inside the Teapot. Teaching New Histories of Philosophy:317-328.
Stephen Maitzen (2005). Anselmian Atheism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):225–239.
Robert Lehe (2009). The Nihilistic Consequences of the Argument From Evil. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):427-437.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-01-13

Total downloads

118 ( #8,076 of 1,101,064 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #19,537 of 1,101,064 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.