The End of the Teapot Argument for Atheism (and All Its Tawdry Imitators)

Atheists sometimes use Bertrand Russell's teapot argument, and its variants with other objects in place of the teapot, to argue for the rationality of atheism. In this paper I show that this use of the teapot argument and its variants is unacceptably circular. The circularity arises because there is indirect evidence against the objects invoked in the arguments.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Mark Sharlow, The End of the Teapot Argument for Atheism (and All Its Tawdry Imitators)
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Anthony Grafton (2004). A Note From Inside the Teapot. Teaching New Histories of Philosophy:317-328.
Stephen Maitzen (2005). Anselmian Atheism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):225–239.
Robert Lehe (2009). The Nihilistic Consequences of the Argument From Evil. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):427-437.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

167 ( #12,229 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

29 ( #34,070 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.