Taste, Gastronomic Expertise and Objectivity
In Fritz Allhoff & David Monroe (eds.), Food & Philosophy. Blackwell (2007)
| Abstract | In this paper I argue that the best explanation of expertise about taste is that such alleged experts are simply more eloquent in describing the taste experiences that they have than are ordinary tasters. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Mark Addis (forthcoming). Linguistic Competence and Expertise. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences.
Kevin Melchionne (2010). On the Old Saw “I Know Nothing About Art but I Know What I Like". Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):131-141.
Harry Collins & Martin Weinel (2011). Transmuted Expertise: How Technical Non-Experts Can Assess Experts and Expertise. Argumentation 25 (3):401-413.
David Archard (2011). Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts. Bioethics 25 (3):119-127.
Stephen Gaukroger (2012). Objectivity: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Bruce D. Weinstein (1994). The Possibility of Ethical Expertise. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1).
Jason Borenstein (2002). Authenticating Expertise. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):85-102.
Bruce D. Weinstein (1993). What is an Expert? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1).
Kevin Melchionne, Acquired Taste. Contemporary Aesthetics.
Elisabeth Schellekens (2009). Taste and Objectivity: The Emergence of the Concept of the Aesthetic. Philosophy Compass 4 (5):734-743.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-08-05Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

