David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 50 (4):577-592 (2011)
What follows is a work of critical reconstruction of Camus' thought. It aims to answer to the wish Camus expressed in his later notebooks, that he at least be read closely. Specifically, I hope to do three things. In Part I, we will show how Camus' famous philosophy of the absurd represents a systematic scepticism whose closest philosophical predecessor is Descartes' method of doubt, and whose consequence, as in Descartes, is the discovery of a single, orienting certainty, on the basis of which Camus would proceed to pass beyond the 'nihilism' that conservative critics continued to level against him (MS 34). Part II will unfold the central tenets of Camus' mature thought of rebellion, and show how Camus' central political claims follow from his para-Cartesian claim to have found an irreducible or 'invincible' basis for a post-metaphysical ethics, consistent with the most thoroughgoing epistemic scepticism. Part III then undertakes to show that the neoclassical rhetoric and positioning Camus claimed for his postwar thought—as a thought of moderation or mesure, and a renewed Greek or Mediterranean naturalism—is more than a stylistic pretension. It represents, so I argue, a singular amalgam of modern and philosophical classical motifs which makes Camus' voice nearly unique in twentieth century ideas, and all the more worth reconsidering today. So let us proceed
|Keywords||Camus philosophy classicism absurd rebellion moderation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Joseph McBride (1992). Albert Camus: Philosopher and Littérateur. St. Martin's Press.
Russell Grigg (2011). The Trial of Albert Camus. Sophia 50 (4):593-602.
Matthew Lamb (2011). Philosophy as a Way of Life: Albert Camus and Pierre Hadot. Sophia 50 (4):561-576.
Gregory Hoskins (2007). Elements of a Post-Metaphysical and Post-Secular Ethics and Politics: Albert Camus on Human Nature and the Problem of Evil. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):141-152.
Daniel Berthold (2013). Kierkegaard and Camus: Either/Or? [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (2):137-150.
Ashley Woodward (2011). Camus and Nihilism. Sophia 50 (4):543-559.
Robert C. Solomon (1999). No Excuses. Teaching Co..
Kathleen O'Dwyer (forthcoming). Camus' Challenge: The Question of Suicide (Is Life Worth Living). Journal of Humanistic Psychology.
Monday Lewis Igbafen (2009). The Existentialist Philosophy of Albert Camus and Africa's Liberation. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):235-247.
Matthew Sharpe (2002). Autonomy, Reflexivity, Tragedy: Notions of Democracy in Camus and Castoriadis. Critical Horizons 3 (1):103-129.
Raymond D. Boisvert (2011). The Fall. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (4):467-482.
Ronald Aronson (2004). Camus & Sartre: The Story of a Friendship and the Quarrel That Ended It. University of Chicago Press.
Ludwig F. Schlecht (2008). “Is Life Worth Living?”. Philosophy and Theology 20 (1/2):227-242.
Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Camus, David Sprintzen & Adrian Van den Hoven (eds.) (2004). Sartre and Camus: A Historic Confrontation. Humanity Books.
David Sherman (2009). Camus. Wiley-Blackwell.
Added to index2011-11-27
Total downloads26 ( #157,406 of 1,934,362 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #195,883 of 1,934,362 )
How can I increase my downloads?